<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://stubs.kingpix.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to choose a movie, Part 1 by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=219#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=219#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I’m not surprised at Emily’s cinematic decision here:  the tachskrieger is widely known as a staunch architectural traditionalist.  It’s all about pitched roofs and half-timbering with them.  (They’re not greyhounds, after all, who love eyebrow canopies and banded windows.)  

Some of the tachskrieger’s favorite films are The Glazer, about the bastardization of the Edward Durell Stones’s 2 Columbus Circle (lots of flame throwers in that one); Out Go the Lights, in which they totally destroy Mies’s Seagram Building solely with kung fu; and the early German talkie Flachesdachzerstörer, which has a big shootout between adherents of Weimar inflationary economic policy and a rogue NSDAP fiscal conservative at the Weissenhofsiedlung.  

The title of the International—the International—is even intended to connote International-style architecture, isn't it?  It is.  That’s why Emily had to eat the International bank.  Its flat roof—representative of the lower orders of people—must be purged from the canons of architecture!  Also, it’s made of cheese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not surprised at Emily’s cinematic decision here:  the tachskrieger is widely known as a staunch architectural traditionalist.  It’s all about pitched roofs and half-timbering with them.  (They’re not greyhounds, after all, who love eyebrow canopies and banded windows.)  </p>
<p>Some of the tachskrieger’s favorite films are The Glazer, about the bastardization of the Edward Durell Stones’s 2 Columbus Circle (lots of flame throwers in that one); Out Go the Lights, in which they totally destroy Mies’s Seagram Building solely with kung fu; and the early German talkie Flachesdachzerstörer, which has a big shootout between adherents of Weimar inflationary economic policy and a rogue NSDAP fiscal conservative at the Weissenhofsiedlung.  </p>
<p>The title of the International—the International—is even intended to connote International-style architecture, isn&#8217;t it?  It is.  That’s why Emily had to eat the International bank.  Its flat roof—representative of the lower orders of people—must be purged from the canons of architecture!  Also, it’s made of cheese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grandma’s favorite overprivledged nihilist. by Nicole Arbusto</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=215#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Arbusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=215#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Did you see "Let the Right One in" ? THAT was good - think it's on DVD this week.
What is it about Vampires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see &#8220;Let the Right One in&#8221; ? THAT was good - think it&#8217;s on DVD this week.<br />
What is it about Vampires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grandma’s favorite overprivledged nihilist. by Scott King</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=215#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=215#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I am glad that the machine made of people behaved as it was programmed to do.  I would be much happier if they just announced them with a press release at the bottom p. 6.  You know, like the Grammys.

I have seen Clone Wars.

Don't see Clone Wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that the machine made of people behaved as it was programmed to do.  I would be much happier if they just announced them with a press release at the bottom p. 6.  You know, like the Grammys.</p>
<p>I have seen Clone Wars.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t see Clone Wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grandma’s favorite overprivledged nihilist. by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=215#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=215#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I am watching the awards now--they just gave the costume award to the Duchess--which I believe revolved around getting a fuckload of money from Paramount, sending an intern to tear 1790s bookplates from an English journal archived in Shrebbleyshire, and throwing two dollars an hour to a collection of Sri Lankan children who sew by candlelight.  The candlelight is a nice touch, though, I have to admit.  Am I blogging in real time?

I guess I am.  Here's what's happening now.  Verne Troyer just announced that Uwe Bowel beat out Uwe Bowel (AMPAS being AMPAS loved In the Name of the King and didn't understand Postal), and now Tom Putnam's accepting for Paris, and now they're just showing 88 Minutes.  All of it. 

Also, I totally agree with everything you say (and am shocked that I, Bob, Adrienne and Jason have not seen Clone Wars).   I had no use for Kantian maxims until I was sixteen, and ET beat out Blade Runner for effects.  I mean, Blade Runner was, well, Blade Runner, and ET was a puppet.  People get pissy that Gigi beat Vertigo but ET was a goddamn rubber doll with a glowy digit.  So I typed out the Categorical Imperative, neatly, on 3x5 cards, and sent them to all the Academy members.  Unfortunately, I sent them to all the members of the Academy of Arts and Sciences (what did I know of the difference?) and got back many letters from Nobel laureates, Pulitzer winners, civic and corporate leaders, scientists and mathematicians, and they were all incredibly apologetic.  

Back to 88 Minutes.  Leelee is also nominated to ITNOTK and I'm pretty sure she's going to have to cut herself in half to win both, a la aspiring starlet Elizabeth Short, who won for that De Palma film, right?  Wow, that's complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am watching the awards now&#8211;they just gave the costume award to the Duchess&#8211;which I believe revolved around getting a fuckload of money from Paramount, sending an intern to tear 1790s bookplates from an English journal archived in Shrebbleyshire, and throwing two dollars an hour to a collection of Sri Lankan children who sew by candlelight.  The candlelight is a nice touch, though, I have to admit.  Am I blogging in real time?</p>
<p>I guess I am.  Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening now.  Verne Troyer just announced that Uwe Bowel beat out Uwe Bowel (AMPAS being AMPAS loved In the Name of the King and didn&#8217;t understand Postal), and now Tom Putnam&#8217;s accepting for Paris, and now they&#8217;re just showing 88 Minutes.  All of it. </p>
<p>Also, I totally agree with everything you say (and am shocked that I, Bob, Adrienne and Jason have not seen Clone Wars).   I had no use for Kantian maxims until I was sixteen, and ET beat out Blade Runner for effects.  I mean, Blade Runner was, well, Blade Runner, and ET was a puppet.  People get pissy that Gigi beat Vertigo but ET was a goddamn rubber doll with a glowy digit.  So I typed out the Categorical Imperative, neatly, on 3&#215;5 cards, and sent them to all the Academy members.  Unfortunately, I sent them to all the members of the Academy of Arts and Sciences (what did I know of the difference?) and got back many letters from Nobel laureates, Pulitzer winners, civic and corporate leaders, scientists and mathematicians, and they were all incredibly apologetic.  </p>
<p>Back to 88 Minutes.  Leelee is also nominated to ITNOTK and I&#8217;m pretty sure she&#8217;s going to have to cut herself in half to win both, a la aspiring starlet Elizabeth Short, who won for that De Palma film, right?  Wow, that&#8217;s complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nazi for reasons yet to be revealed by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=181#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=181#comment-75</guid>
		<description>The bestest part of the picture, in my estimation, comes just after the aforementioned creepy boy/dog with boy mask/fetus in a jar bit.  It turns out to be just a dream (damn!) and so Odette calls her Sassy Black Friend to ask her what she thinks the dream was all about.  Now, any scenarist worth his Syd Field would have Sassy Black Friend say “Dag, girl, we need to go to da club.  Sounds like you need to get some freak on!”

Instead, SBF deadpans “Your vagina is diseased.”

Don’t tell me Goyer didn’t scribble “Suck it, Mankiewicz” in the margins next to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bestest part of the picture, in my estimation, comes just after the aforementioned creepy boy/dog with boy mask/fetus in a jar bit.  It turns out to be just a dream (damn!) and so Odette calls her Sassy Black Friend to ask her what she thinks the dream was all about.  Now, any scenarist worth his Syd Field would have Sassy Black Friend say “Dag, girl, we need to go to da club.  Sounds like you need to get some freak on!”</p>
<p>Instead, SBF deadpans “Your vagina is diseased.”</p>
<p>Don’t tell me Goyer didn’t scribble “Suck it, Mankiewicz” in the margins next to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Batman, not Batman by Scott King</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=193#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=193#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I think the fact that the Nazi high command was willing to drink Cointreau would be the best indicator that this was the beginning of the end of national socialism; by 1944: Root Beer Schnapps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fact that the Nazi high command was willing to drink Cointreau would be the best indicator that this was the beginning of the end of national socialism; by 1944: Root Beer Schnapps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Batman, not Batman by bob</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=193#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=193#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Cointreau can be delicious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cointreau can be delicious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in the stars, but in the advice they take from their representation. by Scott King</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=106#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=106#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I used to do the trailer thing, but I see so few movies that I don't get overloaded with information.  Except for the trailer for Seven Pounds, which tried so hard to be clever and gave away EVERYTHING.

I actually think they did a pretty good job with Rachel, though it's not totally my kind of film.  You may be right though about the self-awareness.  Maybe people need to be more into doing the movie for fun.  I've said it before, and I'll say it again - more Bruce Campbell's, less Peter Berg's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to do the trailer thing, but I see so few movies that I don&#8217;t get overloaded with information.  Except for the trailer for Seven Pounds, which tried so hard to be clever and gave away EVERYTHING.</p>
<p>I actually think they did a pretty good job with Rachel, though it&#8217;s not totally my kind of film.  You may be right though about the self-awareness.  Maybe people need to be more into doing the movie for fun.  I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again - more Bruce Campbell&#8217;s, less Peter Berg&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in the stars, but in the advice they take from their representation. by mike</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=106#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=106#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I had the exact same reaction to this film.  Expectations really are something.  Ironically, the friend that highly recommended this film to me always waits in the lobby during trailers so he has no idea what he's eventually going to be seeing. 

To me, there's a new trend going on with these modern loose films, and that is a complete sense of self-awareness.  If you go back to films like The Celebration, nobody had any idea what they were really doing.  Now that more and more people are jumping on the bandwagon of spontaneity fishing, not only has the aesthetic language has been completely pre-defined, but the performances are self conscious (as there are many examples for comparison).  In the end, no matter what the style, it's all still make believe, and I suppose it's far more impressive to me if the intent is assured and developed through and through versus simply doing an admittedly great job at creating a scenario for actors to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the exact same reaction to this film.  Expectations really are something.  Ironically, the friend that highly recommended this film to me always waits in the lobby during trailers so he has no idea what he&#8217;s eventually going to be seeing. </p>
<p>To me, there&#8217;s a new trend going on with these modern loose films, and that is a complete sense of self-awareness.  If you go back to films like The Celebration, nobody had any idea what they were really doing.  Now that more and more people are jumping on the bandwagon of spontaneity fishing, not only has the aesthetic language has been completely pre-defined, but the performances are self conscious (as there are many examples for comparison).  In the end, no matter what the style, it&#8217;s all still make believe, and I suppose it&#8217;s far more impressive to me if the intent is assured and developed through and through versus simply doing an admittedly great job at creating a scenario for actors to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An eye for an eye deprives the whole world of stereoscopic vision. by Uli de la Lama</title>
		<link>http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=146#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Uli de la Lama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stubs.kingpix.com/?p=146#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Double howl !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double howl !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
